| 1. | North Carolina |
| 2. | Vanderbilt |
| 3. | LSU |
| 4. | Cal State Fullerton |
| 5. | Oregon State |
| 6. | Virginia |
| 7. | Oregon |
| 8. | Florida State |
| 9. | North Carolina State |
| 10. | South Carolina |
| 11. | UCLA |
| 12. | Arizona State |
| 13. | Louisville |
| 14. | Indiana |
| 15. | Mississippi State |
| 16. | Clemson |
| 17. | Oklahoma |
| 18. | Mississippi |
| 19. | South Alabama |
| 20. | Rice |
| 21. | Arkansas |
| 22. | Florida |
| 23. | Cal Poly SLO |
| 23. | Kentucky |
| 25. | Arizona |

Good and Bad Voters of "Week 12" (posted 11/20/10)Kirk Herbstreit is the fan favorite once again. He ranked North Carolina State highest and otherwise stayed out of trouble. He continues to break his own record with his 7th win this season.
Las Vegas Review Journal's Mark Anderson picks up his second Bad Voter of the Week in a repeat of Week 10. Anderson was the second most-extreme voter of the week, but he made each one count. All seven were extremes (no near extremes) and he was alone on all seven (nobody agreed). He voted Oregon, Stanford, Arkansas and Virginia Tech lowest. So fans of those schools were most likely to help him to this week's distinction.
PEOPLE'S PICK: Good Voter of "Week 12":
| Name | Good Votes | Bad Votes | Net Good Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kirk Herbstreit | 324 | 11 | 313 |
PEOPLE'S PICK: Bad Voter of "Week 12":
| Name | Good Votes | Bad Votes | Net Bad Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Anderson | 23 | 660 | 637 |
Pollspeak Report for 'Week 12' (posted 11/20/10)A W is a W. Read the full story on CBSSPORTS.COM by following the link.
Note: Clicking a team link in this blog will show you how everyone voted for that team. Clicking a voter name link will show you their ballot.
Wisconsin earned some serious style points this week. By “style points”, I mean stylishly destroying Indiana 83 to 20! Getting that many points has to impress everyone. It definitely impressed the voters since the Badgers remain the highest ranked one-loss team in the BCS human polls (No. 5). However, it didn’t impress the computers one byte. BCS computers are mandated to exclude margin of victory in their rankings. In fact, the computers actually dropped Wisconsin an average of two places from last week (from 10 to 12). BCS computers have no sense of style.
Outside the top four, there are two ranked, non-BCS teams: Utah and Nevada. This week’s polls, particularly the Coaches’ Poll, are a lesson in just how important record is to ranking. If you remove, Utah and Nevada, every other team falls in line based on their record: the first four teams have no losses, the next 7 have one loss, the next 5 have two losses, and the last seven have three losses. The other polls aren’t quite as delineated as the Coaches’ Poll, but they’re close.
It’s safe to say that the number-one factor in determining a team’s ranking is its record. That’s why Pollspeak always advocates using head-to-head results as a tie-breaker only when two teams have the same number of losses. On that note…
Head to Head Lines:
The ACC is a bit tricky to figure out this season. Especially when there are four teams with 7-3 records that have only one head-to-head result each: NC State, Florida State, Maryland and Miami. Maryland only received one vote this week in the AP, so let’s focus on the other three:
· NC State beat Florida State
· Florida State beat Miami
· NC State and Miami don’t play
They all have the same record, so in the makeshift playoff we call the regular season, the teams should be ranked in this order:
· NC State
· Florida State
· Miami
However, all three human polls have Miami on top, Harris Interactive has FSU at No. 25 and none of them have NC State in the top 25. It’s exactly the opposite of the head-to-head order. That means a bunch of people got it wrong; however, there are so many wrongdoers, I’m going to try something different. I’m going to give kudos to all of those who got it right. Here is their chance to stand out and shine in the bright spotlight:
The following people MAY have gotten it right, but since they didn’t rank ANY of the three teams, it’s hard to give them full credit:
That’s still only 14 out of 60 voters who got it right and 13 more who maybe got it right. More than half of the voters got at least one pair wrong based on head-to-head results. OK, I can’t go without at least one tiny, off-handed mention of one person who got it all wrong:
The Voter who has it most backwards is
who has Miami at No. 22, Florida State at No. 25 and NC State unranked.
For some reason, people tend to focus on the negatives about voters, so I hope Pollspeak readers appreciate this attempt to highlight the positives.
We'll post here, Facebook, RSS and tweet whenever a new blog goes up.
Advice for women on how to cope with their partner's erectile dysfunction. viagra at canadian pharmacy 100mg viagra online without prescription Methods and results 285 patients with CAD divided into three age-matched groups: group 1 (G1, n = 95), ACS and one-vessel disease (1-VD); group 2 (G2, n = 95), ACS and 2,3-VD; group 3 (G3, n = 95), chronic CS. Control group (C, n = 95) was composed of patients with suspected CAD who were found to have entirely normal coronary arteries by angiography. Gensini's score used to assess extent of CAD. ED as any value < 26 according to the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). ED prevalence was lower in G1 vs. G3 (22 vs. 65%, P < .0001) as a result of less atherosclerotic burden as expressed by Gensini's score [2 (0-6) vs. 40 (19-68), P = 0.0001]. Controls had ED rate values similar to G1 (24%). Group 2 ED rate, IIEF, and Gensini's scores were significantly different from G1 [55%, P < 0.0001; 24 (17-29), P = 0.0001; 21 (12.5-32), P < 0.0001] and similar to G3 suggesting that despite similar clinical presentation, ED in ACS differs according to the extent of CAD. No significant difference between groups was found in the number and type of conventional risk factors. Treatment with beta-blockers was more frequent in G3 vs. G1 and G2. In G3 patients who had ED, onset of sexual dysfunction occurred before CAD onset in 93%, with a mean time interval of 24 [12-36] months. In logistic regression analysis, age (OR=1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-1.16; P = < 0.0001), multi-vessel vs. single-vessel (OR=2.53; 95% CI, 1.43-4.51; P = 0.0002), and CCS vs. ACS (OR=2.32; 95% CI, 1.22-4.41; P = 0.01) were independent predictors of ED. best drugstore where you can buy viagra canadian pharmacy viagra for sale online buy Viagra 100mg here brand viagra online without prescription Novel PDE-5 selective inhibitor chemically unrelated to sildenafil and vardenafil. Effective for mild, moderate, and severe ED of varying etiologies, including both organic and psychogenic causes. What is the dose of sildenafil (Viagra)? Physical symptoms related to excessive stress are breathlessness and loss of sexual drive, headaches, and infections, indigestion, tingling of hands and feet and changes in sleep pattern. Excessive stress can also lead to the some mental problems like memory lapses, difficulty in making decisions, and lack of concentration.