ADVERTISEMENT
FacebookTwitterYoutubeFeed

ADVERTISEMENT

Check here each week for the latest articles during football season.  Past weeks' football articles can be found using the "Week" menu on the bar above.  The awards are defined on the Awards page.

 

Good and Bad Voters of "Week 5" (posted 10/3/09)

Both the Good and Bad voters of the Week were second choices to the regularly polarizing Doug Lesmerises.  Good Voter, Ray Ratto, didn't vote any team lowest, but voted four teams highest.  Although he writes for the San Francisco Chronicle, he seems to love him some Alabama teams, and likely earned a lot of votes from Auburn fans after he ranked the Tigers No. 8.

Meanwhile, Paul Arnett of the Honolulu Star-Bulletin was picked as Bad Voter of the Week.  Undoubtedly this is because he ranked California (No. 10) over Oregon (Unranked) after the Ducks pummeled the Golden Bears last weekend.  This was the largest differential of all the voters.  That was a good piece of detective work, Oregon fans.

PEOPLE'S PICK:  Good Voter of "Week 5":

Name Good Votes Bad Votes Net Good Votes
Ray Ratto 119 13 106

PEOPLE'S PICK: Bad Voter of "Week 5":

Name Good Votes Bad Votes Net Bad Votes
Paul Arnett 6 202 196


Honorable Mention:

Doug Lesmerises once again has both the most good and bad votes.  However, it looks like he's starting to win over more people than he is upsetting...barely.
Name Good Votes Bad Votes Net Good Votes
Doug Lesmerises 439 432 7

Pollspeak's Report On "Week 5" Polls (posted 9/28/09)

Also read this on SI.COM

The biggest poll news this week is the release of the Harris Interactive College Football Poll, which makes up one-third of the BCS formula.  Unfortunately, like the Coaches’ Poll, there are no public ballots to look at.  It’s even more unfortunate that public record laws won’t apply to most of the Harris voters.  So the only way to change how the Harris Poll is run is to get the BCS to require public ballots.  There’s no easy way to do that, but Pollspeak sponsors a petition asking them nicely.

Until then, we can look at the Harris Poll as a whole and make some generalizations.  Not to add fuel to a forest fire, but the two BCS Polls (Coaches’ and Harris), both still rank Penn State over Iowa after the Hawkeyes defeated the Nittany Lions last weekend.  Whereas the AP Poll (the one with the public ballots) rightfully has Iowa (No. 13) over Penn State (No. 15).   Maybe if the BCS required public ballots, more of their voters would start paying better attention.

The Harris voters ranked Ohio State and Penn State higher than any other poll (AP and Coaches) or BCS computer.  They also ranked Miami and Georgia Tech lower than any other poll.   Without seeing ballots, it’s hard to call bias because the Harris Poll actually has a solid method of choosing voters:  10 representatives from each conference plus one for each independent school for a total of 114.  That’s more objective than the Coaches’ or AP selection process and might be what helps teams like BYU earn its highest ranking.  Still, it would be great to get a polls-peak under the hood and find out.

As for the ever-transparent AP, Doug Lesmerises continues to be the most extreme voter (again extreme is not the same as bad).  He had an opportunity to explain his ballot on ESPN College Gameday last Saturday and seemed to convince fellow voter Kirk Herbstreit, but Craig James could not be swayed.  As it is, Lesmerises is becoming less extreme as the weeks go by.  Not because he is changing his ways.  Instead, the games are playing themselves out and more voters are forced to leave their assumptions behind in place of on-the-field results.  Now that there is a larger sample size, they are starting to do what Lesmerises has been doing from week one.  Of course, some voters still haven’t let on-the-field results impede their decisions:

The most recent examples are the five AP voters that have Penn State ranked over Iowa.  That’s still a lot better than the Coaches or Harris Interactive voters, but what are those five people thinking?  Iowa has played better competition, has a better record and beat Penn State head-to-head in Happy Valley by two scores.  What possible reason could there be for Penn State to be ranked higher right now?  The worst offender is Jay G. Tate of the Montgomery Advertiser, who has Penn State ranked No. 11, but Iowa only at No. 22.

Previously, some people thought it was funny to rank Houston over Oklahoma State even though the Cougars have a better record and beat the Cowboys by two scores in Stillwater.  Now that the Cougars have also beaten Texas Tech, it’s become the norm.  However, ten voters still have Oklahoma State ranked higher.  Pete DiPrimio is leading that charge, ranking the Cowboys No. 14 but leaving Houston unranked.

Of course there are the situations you can count on, like the 49 of 60 voters that have Oklahoma over BYU, but trying to reverse that would be asking too much.  Instead, I’ll continue to point out the examples that are so clear cut that if we don’t step in, the Division of Forestry will.  That bit of logging humor was in honor of Oregon’s lopsided victory over Cal last weekend.  On that note, 9 voters, including Craig James, still ranked the Golden Bears over the Ducks.  I hope things change next week.  I’m not sure if I have another lumberjack joke in me.

 

First Harris Interactive Football Poll of '09 Released  (posted 9/27/09)

The Harris Interactive College Football Poll accounts for one-third of the BCS formula.  As usual you can view it in Pollstalker HERE, and compare it to the other BCS components.  Unfortunately, the ballots are still not made public this year.  Pollspeak's petition to help change that can be found HERE.

Also, you can read the Harris Interactive press release (including a list of voters), and check out Pollspeak's comparison of '09 to '08 Harris Interactive voters.


ADVERTISEMENT

FaceBook News

ADVERTISEMENT

All you need to know when buying Viagra Online viagra online without prescription What Are the Differences Between Cialis, Levitra, and Viagra? The bottom line, as I see it, is that pharmaceutical companies don't care how their drugs are sold or who uses them, even if there's no justified medical use whatsoever. They simply want to sell more prescription drugs, generate more pharmaceutical profits, and fatten up their own bank accounts. If you have erectile dysfunction (ED), you may experience many emotions, including anger and resentment. While this is understandable, you shouldn't "shut out" your partner while dealing with the problem. Your partner is also affected by your condition. Not only is good communication essential to successful diagnosis and treatment, it can help your partner understand what you are going through. Although the hallmark feature of MDSCs is immunosuppression, emerging data reveal that the degree of immunosuppression varies among populations of MDSCs isolated from different organs, with intratumoral MDSCs being the most immunosuppressive. Interestingly, these MDSCs express greater levels of NOS2 and ARG1 than their splenic counterparts (5). ARG1 expression is mainly regulated by the STAT-6–IL-4R pathway (30). We recently correlated IL-4R expression on CD11b+/Gr-1+ with an immunosuppressive phenotype (29), and our in vitro data (Fig. 5) indicate that sildenafil down-regulates IL-4R on MDSCs. We then asked whether in vivo PDE5 inhibition reduced ARG1 and NOS2 and down-regulated IL-4R in tumor-associated MDSCs. BALB/c mice were challenged with CT26WT, and half were treated with sildenafil. Mice were killed 15 d later, and intratumoral MDSCs were obtained. Sildenafil increased cGMP (Fig. 6 A), reduced IL-4R expression (Fig. 6 B), and down-regulated NOS2 and ARG1 expression and reduced their enzymatic activity in the intratumoral MDSCs (Fig. 6, C and D). Considering that ARG1 and NOS2 are key enzymes in MDSC suppressive pathways (8, 31), these findings support the hypothesis that PDE5 inhibition is a novel pharmacologic approach to regulate MDSC-mediated immunosuppressive pathways.

Viagra pfizer uk » Online Canadian Pharmacy